International forskning

Cannabis-Based Products for Chronic Pain : An Updated Systematic Review


Roger Chou 1, Rongwei Fu 2, Azrah Y Ahmed 1, Benjamin J Morasco 3

  • 1Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Division of Medical Informatics, Clinical Epidemiology & Translational Data Science, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (R.C., A.Y.A.).
  • 2Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Division of Medical Informatics, Clinical Epidemiology & Translational Data Science, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland; and School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University, Portland, Oregon (R.F.).
  • 3Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland; and Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (B.J.M.).

Affiliationer

Background: Benefits and harms of cannabinoids for chronic pain are uncertain.

Purpose: To update an evidence synthesis on cannabinoids for chronic pain.

Data sources: Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus to 28 July 2025.

Study selection: Randomized placebo-controlled trials.

Data extraction: Data extraction, risk of bias, and strength of evidence were dually reviewed. Cannabinoids were categorized by tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)-to-cannabidiol (CBD) ratio (high, comparable, or low), source (synthetic, purified, extracted), and administration method.

Data synthesis: 25 short-term (1 to 6 months) randomized controlled trials (n = 2303; 64% neuropathic pain) assessed cannabinoids. Oral synthetic/purified high THC-to-CBD (THC only) may slightly reduce and oromucosal, extracted, comparable THC-to-CBD ratio products probably slightly reduce pain severity (pooled differences, -0.78 and -0.54 points, respectively, [0 to 10 scale]), with moderate or large increased dizziness, sedation, and nausea. Among THC-only products, nabilone moderately reduced pain severity but dronabinol did not (pooled differences, -1.59 and -0.23 points, respectively). Low THC-to-CBD interventions may not improve outcomes. Although low THC-to-CBD mixed THC/CBD products may increase dizziness, sedation, and nausea, CBD alone may not increase harms.

Limitation: Variability within categories; lack of product details; unclear U.S. availability of studied products; restricted to English-language studies.

Conclusion: Comparable and high THC-to-CBD ratio cannabinoid products may result in small improvements in pain and increased common adverse events during short-term treatment of primarily neuropathic pain; among high-ratio THC-only products, nabilone (but not dronabinol) reduced pain. Low THC-to-CBD products may not improve outcomes. Studies are needed on long-term outcomes and other cannabis product types.