Efficacy and safety of six new antiseizure medications for adjunctive treatment of focal epilepsy and epileptic syndrome: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
Jingyi Tong 1, Tingting Ji 1, Ting Liu 1, Jiaqi Liu 1, Yibin Chen 1, Zongjun Li 1, Na Lu 2, Qifu Li 3
- 1Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570102, China; Key Laboratory of Brain Science Research and Transformation in Tropical Environment of Hainan Province, Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570102, China.
- 2Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570102, China. Electronic address: luyujia9989@126.com.
- 3Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570102, China; Key Laboratory of Brain Science Research and Transformation in Tropical Environment of Hainan Province, Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570102, China. Electronic address: lee-chief@163.com.
Affiliationer
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of six new antiseizure medications (ASMs) for adjunctive treatment in adult patients with focal epilepsy and adolescents with Dravet syndrome (DS), Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), or tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC).
Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane library databases from inception to October 13, 2023. We included published studies for a systematic review and a network meta-analysis (NMA). The efficacy and safety were reported in terms of a 50% response rate and dropout rate along with serious adverse events (SAEs). The outcomes were ranked with the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).
Results: Twenty eligible trials with 5516 patients and 21 interventions, including placebo, contributed to the analysis. Included ASMs were brivaracetam (BRV), cenobamate (CBM), cannabidiol (CBD), fenfluramine (FFM), everolimus (ELM), and soticlestat (SLT). The six new ASMs were compared in four different epilepsy subtypes. In focal epilepsy treatment, BRV seemed to be safe [vs placebo, risk ratio (RR) = 0.69, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.25-1.91] and effective (vs placebo, RR = 2.18, 95 % CI: 1.25-3.81). In treating focal epilepsy, CBM 300 mg was more effective at a 50 % response rate (SUCRA 91.8 %) compared with BRV and CBD. However, with the increase in dosage, more SAEs (SUCRA 85.6 %) appeared compared with other ASMs. CBD had good efficacy on LGS (SUCRA 88.4) and DS (SUCRA 66.2), but the effect on adult focal epilepsy was not better than that of placebo [vs placebo, RR = 0.83 (0.36-1.93)]. The NMA indicated that the likelihood of the most appropriate intervention (SUCRA 91.2 %) with minimum side effects(SUCRA 12.5 %)for the DS was FFM. Compared with CBD, high exposure to ELM demonstrated a more effective treatment of TSC (SUCRA 89.7 %). More high-quality SLT studies are needed to further evaluate the efficacy and safety. The comparison-adjusted funnel plots of annualized relapse rate and side effects in the included studies revealed no significant funnel plot asymmetry.
Conclusions: This NMA indicated that the most effective treatment strategy for focal epilepsy, DS, Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, and TSC, respectively, included CBM 300 mg, FFM, CBD, and ELM. However, the aforementioned findings need further confirmation.